![]() Story then quickly rejected concerns over State judicial sovereignty. Thus, because it was established that the states had the power to rule on federal issues it must be true that the Supreme Court can review the decision or the Supreme Court would not have appellate jurisdiction in 'all other cases.' Furthermore, the Supremacy Clause declares that the federal interpretation will trump the state's interpretation. If the Supreme Court could not review decisions from the highest state court, the state courts would be excluded from ever hearing a case in any way involving a federal question, because the Supreme Court would be deprived of appellate jurisdiction in those cases. 2, stating that 'in all other cases before mentioned the Supreme Court shall have appellate jurisdiction' showed a textual commitment to allow Supreme Court review of state decisions. Story found that it was clear from history and the preamble of the Constitution that the federal power was given directly by the people and not by the states. ![]() Story first confronted the argument that federal judicial power came from the states, and therefore that the Supreme Court had no right to overrule a state's interpretation of the treaty without its consent.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |